NanoBeadMillwet grinding
PM-M series · PM-MD

Disc-Type Bead Mill

PM-MDD90 3 – 20 µm0.6 – 1.5 mm mediaHighest tonnes per kW

If the target is 'under 10 µm, as many tonnes as possible', the disc rotor is still the cheapest way to get there. It is not the finest and not the narrowest — it is the one that keeps running.

RotorDisc stack
Media0.6 – 1.5 mm
TargetD90 3 – 20 µm
SeparatorSlotted screen

Free grinding test available · reply within 24 h · no obligation

See the specification table
Media 0.6 – 1.5 mmSlotted screen separationDiscs replaceable individuallyLargest installed base
Application match

Where a disc rotor is the correct answer

Most bead mills sold into coatings and minerals are disc mills, and usually that is right. These are the six cases where it still is.

What you are makingThe problem people arrive with Why this configuration helps
Architectural coating, volume gradeThe mill is the constraint in the line — you need more tonnes, not a finer numberThe disc stack pumps as it grinds, so throughput per kilowatt is higher than any pin geometry at the same fineness
Mineral filler slurry (CaCO₃, talc)Media consumption is the biggest cost line, not electricityLarge media at moderate tip speed wears slowly, and 1.0 – 1.5 mm beads are the cheapest per kilogram you can put in a mill
Gravure and flexographic inkSolvent-based product, and the mill has to be explosion-proof without doubling the priceA simple chamber with fewer precision parts is cheaper to build in ATEX execution
Adhesive and sealant premixViscosity climbs during the pass and the mill starts to starveThe disc generates strong axial flow, which keeps feeding a charge that is thickening
Ceramic body slip and glazeIron contamination from worn steel, and the mill runs 24 hPU or ceramic discs and lining, with a wear allowance you can measure and plan for
Recycled fibre and de-inkingContaminants in the feed — the mill has to survive things it was not designed forNo fine screen in the main flow path, and a chamber you can open in twenty minutes

If your specification includes the spread of the distribution, or a D90 below 1 µm, read the pin-type page before this one.

Design

What you are paying for — and what you are not

A disc mill is a simpler machine than a pin or turbine mill. That is the point, and it is also the limit.

01 — Rotor

A stack of discs, not a precision pin field

Feature
Flat or slightly profiled discs on a shaft, with spacers between them.
Advantage
Manufacturing tolerance is looser, so the machine costs less to build and less to repair.
Benefit
At 3 – 10 µm that tolerance costs you nothing in result, so you are not paying for precision the application cannot use.
02 — Flow

Pumping is built into the geometry

Feature
The rotating disc stack drives slurry axially through the chamber.
Advantage
Higher volumetric flow per kilowatt than a pin rotor at the same tip speed.
Benefit
More tonnes per shift from the same motor — which is normally the number the plant is measured on.
03 — Wear

Discs are consumables, and priced like it

Feature
Each disc is a separate part on a common shaft.
Advantage
You replace one disc, not a rotor assembly.
Benefit
Wear cost per tonne is predictable and low; on abrasive mineral slurry this dominates the owning cost.
04 — Separation

A slotted screen, sized to the media

Feature
0.6 mm and above is comfortably outside the range where screens blind.
Advantage
No dynamic separator, no extra drive, no extra power draw.
Benefit
One less system to maintain — and one less thing to explain to a shift team at 3 a.m.
Specification

PM-MD models and working envelope

The disc configuration covers the widest size range in the PM-M series, because it is the one used for the largest tonnages.

ModelChamber volumeMotor powerMedia rangeThroughputTarget fineness
PM-MD3030 L37 kW0.6 – 1.2 mm200 – 800 L/hD90 2 – 15 µm
PM-MD6060 L75 kW0.6 – 1.5 mm600 – 2,000 L/hD90 2 – 15 µm
PM-MD150150 L160 kW0.8 – 1.5 mm1,500 – 5,000 L/hD90 3 – 20 µm

Model figures are typical for this configuration — the binding specification comes with your quotation. Throughput depends more on your slurry than on the chamber, so treat these as the range we would expect, not a promise.

Common to every PM-MD

  • Wetted parts: SS316L, polyurethane, silicon carbide or zirconia
  • Separator: slotted screen, slot matched to media
  • Cooling: full chamber jacket, chilled water
  • Seal: double mechanical seal with barrier fluid
  • Control: PLC + HMI, recipe storage, temperature and pressure interlocks
  • Options: ATEX configuration, ceramic discs, wear-compensated spacers
Next step

Before you buy, send us a kilogram

Send 1 – 2 kg and we will run the pass series on a PM-MD at the media size we would quote. You get the curve, the specific energy and a budget price.

Send 1 kg of your material

Slurry if you have it; powder plus the carrier you intend to use if you do not. We will send the address and the customs description to use, so it clears without a hold.

We run a size-reduction series

On the configuration we would actually quote. D10 / D50 / D90 after each pass, plus product temperature, so you can see where the curve flattens.

You get the curve, the model and a budget price

Whether or not you buy. The report is yours to show your own board or your customer.

Other applications

Grinding something else?

PM-MD is the volume workhorse of the range. The other seven configurations exist because it does not cover everything.

Nano Bead Mill — PM-N series
PM-N

Nano Bead Mill Most requested

Small media, gap or centrifugal separation, aggressive chamber cooling.

Choose it when: Worth it only if your application genuinely needs sub-100 nm.

PM-NP pinPM-NT turbinePM-NX centrifugalPM-NC all-ceramicPM-NV vertical
View series →
Lab & Pilot Mill — PM-L series
PM-L

Lab & Pilot Mill Most requested

Same media and tip speed as the production machine, so results scale.

Choose it when: Start here if you need to prove a target before buying capacity.

PM-L labPM-P pilot
View series →
Basket Mill — PM-B series
PM-B

Basket Mill

Single-vessel dispersion — no external pump or recirculation loop.

Choose it when: Best for many formulations in small batches, or when cleaning time dominates.

PM-B standardPM-B vacuumPM-B cosmetic
View series →
Dry Grinding Mill — PM-D series
PM-D

Dry Grinding Mill

Dry micronisation with air classification and dust collection.

Choose it when: For powders that cannot be processed wet — no drying step downstream.

PM-D air-classified
View series →
High-Viscosity Mill — PM-V series
PM-V

High-Viscosity Mill

Built for high-solid and high-viscosity material, with screw discharge.

Choose it when: For pastes and highly loaded compounds a standard mill will not move.

PM-V hopper-fed
View series →
Mining & Large-Scale Mill — PM-X series
PM-X

Mining & Large-Scale Mill

Stirred media mills sized for mineral slurry at plant throughput.

Choose it when: Selected on throughput and media consumption, not on fineness alone.

PM-X stirred media
View series →
Complementary Equipment — PM-A series
PM-A

Complementary Equipment

Three-roll mills, inline pre-dispersion, mixers and spray dryers.

Choose it when: Often the cheapest throughput gain is better pre-dispersion, not a bigger mill.

PM-A3R three-rollPM-AID inline disperserPM-AX mixer / emulsifierPM-ASD spray dryer
View series →
Full range

All eight configurations

The complete index — wet and dry, 0.5 L laboratory units through to plant-scale stirred media mills.

Open the equipment index →
Questions

Before you ask

Why is a disc mill cheaper than a pin mill?

Fewer precision parts. A pin rotor needs pins set to a controlled gap against the chamber wall; a disc stack does not. That difference shows up in the price and again in every spare part for the next ten years.

Can a disc mill reach 1 µm?

It can get close with small media and several passes, but the distribution widens and energy per tonne climbs steeply. Below about 1 µm the economics favour a pin rotor.

What media size should I use?

0.6 – 0.8 mm for 2 – 5 µm, 1.0 – 1.5 mm for 5 – 20 µm. Larger media wears slower and costs less per kilogram, so do not go finer than the target requires.

How often do discs need replacing?

It depends entirely on the slurry. On soft pigment, years; on abrasive mineral filler, months. We will tell you the wear volume per 1,000 hours for your material rather than a number in a brochure.

Still deciding

Disc or pin — it comes down to one question

Is the spread of your distribution part of the specification, or only the median? If it is only the median, buy the disc mill and spend the difference on media.